|
| Initiated mostly by recent accounting frauds within several large
enterprises in our western economy, many companies focus on the (im)maturity
of their organization and/or parts of that and on implementing or
reinforcing of corporate governance systems. Meanwhile,
underlying work is being done to bring the whole organization to
maturity, in order to avoid surprises from the periphery at such scales.
Change processes have had, as mentioned before, a rather unpredictable chance of success (many failed projects). The bigger the projects, the larger the impact on the results of the enterprise. For the time being, firmer checking and control are essential, but surrounding these processes by a mature organization will be even better. Be aware, though, that maturing a change organization only makes sense if the rest of the organization is at, or becomes of, minimally the same maturity level. It is for this reason that a survey may be required about the maturity level of the whole organization or where appropriate. Should an area be not insufficient mature, these could be developed prior to developing the change organization any further. Maturity - in general - is characterized by
The maturity of a (change) organization can be measured according to the following elements:
In the IT industry the Capability Maturity Model (CMM) is being
mentioned, to be used for determination of maturity levels of the IT
organization. CMM is developed for the IT organization. Because the
change organization is multidisciplinary, it is important to choose a
different, more uniform, separation of maturity levels. Of course, you
are free to work with any other method, such as CMM for IT, but be aware
of the potential risk of sub-optimization. |